The Wonder Springs Chronicle
No Skin In The Game X
15 June 2011
Volume 13, Issue 25
Access now the fresh insights of The Wonder
Springs Chronicle - Front Page. Be sure to check out the grizzly
times wisdom and fresh insights of BruteÕ Griz every Friday. This column also
now appears each Wednesday on Deep Woods Moola and The
Creation Leadership Center.
To make a donation to the Wonder Springs community please do
so at the address below, or follow the donation links on the website.
View as PDF - - - Print Article
Monday, about midmorning there was a knock on my door.
Opening the door, at first I didnÕt see anyone; then I felt this tugging on my
pant leg, when I looked down I amazingly saw what looked like a kidÕs little stuffed
purple dinosaur:
ÒHi, my name is Barney
and I am really miffed, because I am supposed to be the only real dinosaur in
existence at this time, and not only do those financial dinosaurs and behemoths
get more adult attention than I do, but their fossilized money rackets are
cutting seriously into my sales.
ÒHow can a little guy make any money, when those evolutionary
vestiges of a bygone era seem to think that they have access to enough money to
make the world turn on its axis. Furthermore they canÕt even dance and sing.
ÒI want you to do your best to tell the world and those
troglodyte politicians that they need to create a new version of the depression
era Glass-Steagall
Act, which all real dinosaurs and a rapidly growing list of repentant
humans, know should have never been repealed. If humans donÕt break up these
too big to fail mastodons, the whole world will soon become an economic Ice
Age.
To which I responded: ÒIt seems, you pretty much made the
case yourself, Barney; I doubt those troglodyte politicians will listen to me,
but since you made this special appearance here at Wonder Springs; maybe they
will listen to you.Ó
I looked down again, and this happy, smiling, purple, mini
Tyrannosaurus rex, was disappearing into the bushes.
When you read last weekÕs Skin IX
synopsis of the development and the decline of American capitalism, you quickly
and absolutely realized you had not read a similar description elsewhere, especially
in anything related to economics. For good reason, I am not and economist, but
rather and ecologist-engineer-entrepreneur, who as been fascinated by the
development, or true lack thereof, of the North American frontier.
Furthermore because of my scientific training, for most of my
life I have considered economics, along with psychology, sociology and others,
pseudoscience, which majors in abstract observations of either the obvious, or
the unknowable, or the pedantic interactions of the two. Therefore I have
created a totally empirical review of last weekÕs article:
Whenever you create a totally theoretical reality, last week
defined as the evolution of American economics and finance over the last fifty
years or so, without any paradigms stating any absolute moral hazards, you have
indeed absolutely created a true crisis destiny. To use the now popular
economic and debt metaphor, no kicking the can down the road is going to change
that reentry necessity—into a real world governed by created natural law.
What part of Òget a real lifeÓ donÕt you want to understand?
On Monday NYU economist Nouriel Roubini issued a ÒPerfect
StormÓ economic forecast that may occur as early as 2013, then again we might
see slow growth, or we might see rapid economic growth. I have just finished an
audio version of the book he wrote with Steven Mihm: Crisis
Economics: A Course in the Future of Finance.
The book is somewhat dated, with most of the data from 2009
and before. It also shows the reality that AmericaÕs substantial economic
problems are in tune with what Barney had to say at the beginning of this
article; that behemoths, dinosaurs and mastodons are controlling the economic
world and unless significant changes are made, which his Monday report must
assume are not happening, then we will face a (continuing: emphasis mine) world
economic financial crisis.
As with the thinking of academics, the book has many great
ideas to fix our economic ills, some of which I agree with, some I do not, and
some I just donÕt know enough about the situation to have an opinion. The book, keeping within a paradigm of
idea theory, runs a financial deficit on how to truly implement much, if
anything.
What is very worthwhile is the understanding that all the
Òinnovative financial productsÓ that brought down the system in 2007 are really
myopic illusions of risk aversion and leverage that are not available to the
common man. As a result, out of the list of ten investments I mentioned at the
close of last weekÕs episode, gains in the first eight (updated from seven last
week) of them were essentially wiped out in the Òsaving the world from imminent
financial collapseÓ and the following Great Recession; which may be heading
into the ÒPerfect Storm Depression.Ó
So let us look at those ten historic investments as a simple
continuum, starting from the most secure to the most risky, that you with a
computer and a debt-credit card, a line of credit, or through personal networks
and contacts can make investments with the hope of increasing your net worth
and create wealth:
Bank Savings Account—Money Market Fund—Certificate
of Deposit—Mutual Fund of Corporate Bonds—Mutual Fund of Blue Chip
Stocks—Mutual Fund of Risky Growth Stocks—Real Estate—Direct
Stock Investments—Gold and Precious Metals—Currency and Commodity
Trading.
What is not included on that list because they have been
virtually extinct since the 1980s is investments in startup companies. As we
have pointed out (almost) ad nauseam is that national statistics reported by
the Kauffman
Foundation show that all job creation in the United States is created by
startups, in essentially their first two years, and that every other business
enterprise summary statistic thereafter show net job losses! In other words
after the end of the startup era, job changes are essentially rearranging deck
chairs on the Titanic, throwing a few overboard, in the name of economies of
scale, mergers and acquisitions, or other such keeping the ship from sinking
spin.
Furthermore, the famous Bill Gates and others may have become
billionaires when their company stocks went public, but all the wealth was
really created in the issuance of foundersÕ shares and early rounds of equity
financing. None of the above top ten investments will create any wealth other
than some type of compound interest. Microsoft being a compound interest exception,
for when it split stock two for one, way back sometime in ancient history, it
has since traded in the mid twenties thereafter ($24.22 Tuesday close).
So the United States economy has been living off of compound
interest, retained earnings, debt and leverage, simply because we have so
permuted the monetary continuum towards giant banks, debt, leverage, and fiat
money for so long, the nation has been made bankrupt, by whom our friend Barney
will hope would permanently go extinct: Financial dinosaurs, behemoths,
mastodons and other humungous Industrial Age corporate relics.
Back to our list of ten, the two that are left are
investments in gold and gambling with puts and calls in commodities and
currencies. It is pretty much a universal law, both historic and present, that
precious metals are a hedge against economic turmoil in turbulent times. That
is especially true today, because as a medium of financial exchange you really
canÕt trade a few hundred milligrams of gold for a box of cereal, a loaf of
bread, or a gallon of gas.
As far as commodities, you have much better odds in a high
roller game of craps at the casino than playing with the big market makers,
with access to oceans of debt-leverage-fiat money, and no other place to make
their market trades.
I was in the Army stationed in Germany when Richard Nixon
closed the gold window in 1971. Overnight the exchange rate took about a twenty
percent hit, and by the time I rotated back to the states in early 1972, it was
about thirty if I remember correctly.
When I had finally begun to get in touch with the American
economy again, I adopted the worldview that the Germans could out engineer any other
country in the world, the Japanese were the best manufacturers, and the Yanks
were the worldÕs entrepreneurs.
In todayÕs new world order, the Germans still typically do
the best consistent engineering in the world. Even with the earthquake, the
Japanese still know how to manufacture high quality stuff with no equal. Today
that engineering and manufacturing may be overseen anywhere in the world, but
those two principals remain true.
The United States, in contrast, as become the dead-beat debtor
to the world, which on a per capita basis puts us on par with Greece. Why has
that happened?
Quite simply the United States sent her entrepreneurs to
concentration-extermination camps and let loose a bunch a wantabe fascist-lites:
bankers, financial innovators, crony capitalists, lobbyists and politicians who
claimed to have all the answers to preserving American exceptionalism.
Is that too tough of a criticism? I suppose the jury is still
out; for we are still feeding the living extinct, while the troglodyte
politicians dither over debt reduction and redistribution of wealth, that wealth
too is extinct, while the mainstream media, lauds the commentators, talking
heads, bimodal pundits, who are all well paid to make sure we keep that can
moving down the road to a financial cliff.
Entrepreneurs must be recreated for our society, because
through a culture of passive compliance, childlike natural wonder is suppressed
as not economically rewarding. The first step to becoming a net job creator
might be enhanced by a secure childhood which will help them understand risk,
with less peril than their compatriots, but really all humans were designed by
God to be entrepreneurs of our own destiny. An article in TuesdayÕs
Wall Street Journal sheds some light on creatively raising future
entrepreneurs.
In the first episode of ÒGod in the
DetailsÓ that precedes this No Skin series, I briefly recounted a late
1980s, Friday afternoon discussion I had with the president of a small securities
brokerage firm for the Vancouver Stock Exchange. What I learned that afternoon
changed the way I look at investing and investments, as well as pretty much set
the stage for today, where I have no skin in the twentieth century game. That game
disappeared for us all in 2007, so I donÕt need to look longingly at the past
that was stolen by liars; or just people who are too simple minded to truly
manage what they say—fields where they were the experts.
Regardless of where we were in those bygone days, all
Americans and world citizens, except the financial innovators, are beginning
again; trying to find a way to at least have enough to enjoy life, even if we
may have to replace a leisurely retirement, with a more rewarding career
opportunity.
That Friday trip probably began with either a meeting with a
then Big 5 accounting firm, or a securities lawyer. After lunch, Robson Strasse
(street) had the best German food outside of Germany; I met with a broker
dealer of one of the smallest securities firms. For a few hours that afternoon,
we when from office to office of small mining companies, most of which were
just public shells, trying to find some firm to acquire, to rapidly bring my
gold mining equipment company into financial reality, without needing to go
through the time and regulatory supervision of a venture IPO.
After a few hours of this, as we were heading back to the
brokerÕs office, both very discouraged for the wasted afternoon, he bluntly
stated: ÒYou know there are 2000 public companies listed on the VSE, 1980 are
basically flight money public shells, invested with the vain hope of finding
the mother lode, or something like that. About twenty companies really have
potential, if you can develop one of those companies, you and we can all do
very well.Ó
As we got back to the company offices, since it was after
trading hours in the Eastern Time zone, he took me by the firmÕs presidentÕs
office, just incase he didnÕt go home after the markets closed. It just so
happened that we were the only three people still in the company. For some
reason the president wasnÕt ready to leave just yet, so he told me he would
explain how I could make a decent living with a company listed on the VSE.
For the next few hours, sharing cups of strong black coffee
sweetened with Cointreau, he explained those details; those I can remember and
are important I will share with you now.
The nature of the listing process basically gave the
companies an initial cap rate of about $2 million CAD. As time went on and the
reasons for incorporating were improving or going the other way, most of the
1980 companies were for sale at a steep discount. At that time depending upon
factors that might be from $250-500 thousand. The major problem however was
there was really no way to truly access these shell liabilities.
Brokers pretty much made their money by placement fees, but
they did take equity positions as part of that, depending upon their own due
diligence as well as the listing documentation, all of which was negotiated
with the to be listed company.
The important reality of once the firm became public, was
that it became its own market maker of its securities; that made sure that the
people with skin in the game were actually in control somewhat of the stock
price. A minor amount of long and short selling of shares was allowed, but
because multiple brokerage houses had some equity in the company, that was
monitored quite closely, not only for potential firm profits, but also it was a
very closed network that was self policing, because while it was all right to
be known as a wild west stock exchange, there were guidelines that were not
crossed, to keep your good standing.
Towards the end of the discussion, I asked a question about
the New York listings at the NYSE and NASDAQ. He then politely explained to me
that in the great USA, the market making brokers that pushed the stocks really
had no significant position in the companies shares they were actively trading,
hence it made no difference to them whether the stock went up or down, only
that the more shares they could trade, the more money they made for themselves,
and if the listed company prospered so much the better.
He then turned his big desk chair towards the east, made some
other despairing remarks, and basically stated that it was all a big Ponzi
Scheme and one day it would all come crashing down. In that context, Bernie
Madoff was the then founder-principal of the NASDAQ, and eventually he decided
to attempt it on his own, with lower overhead and a bigger profit potential.
The president then turned his chair back so that he was again
facing me, made the gesture that it was time to go home for the weekend; and
then remarked something to the effect:
ÒI donÕt know if we will be able to work something out or
not, but remember this, never make an investment in any company or any idea,
unless you can actually go to the company itself, meet with the principals that
run the company and make the decisions. If you donÕt feel good about everything
that transpired, just walk away. You will be happier, sleep better at night,
and never make any mistake that you can truthfully regret.
Since that day, I have accepted that truth. Over the years I
have made some small investments in other companies that really never made it;
not so much because the ideas and the opportunities were not sound, with good
honest participants; but rather it was impossible to attract capital; because
essentially that money had all its skin invested in the regulated, secure, big
Ponzi Scheme game in New York City.
ÒYa, sure, you betcha!Ó
We are just through round one into a multi round match to
see, ÒHowÕs that Ôinnovative financial productsÕ Ponzi Scheme workinÕ out for
Ôya!Ó
After all when that doesnÕt work out you can always, ÒHope in
change! Spare change!Ó
© 2011: All rights reserved.