The
Wonder Springs Chronicle
R
U Normal?
1
November 2010
R
U Normal?
Pretty
much everyone believes that they are normal, even though a great number of
those reading this column would believe that the above question should be
stated: ÒAre you normal?Ó
But
for a long time now, we are told that if we donÕt believe this and that —
that we are not normal. Just a couple of years ago, most people thought so
called progressives were normal people. That feeling applied to both
Republicans and Democrats. The last president that you really would not call a
progressive was Ronald Reagan, but even he was uber-progressive when it came to
national defense and he used that progressivism to bankrupt the former Soviet
Union.
In
that light we all now know that Teddy Roosevelt was the first president that
claimed the progressive title. Furthermore his New Deal cousin FDR, who turned
the Hoover depression into the Great Depression, was mostly responsible for the
changes that bring us to R U normal today.
But
consider the following statements.
This
is a center-right country.
The
mainstream media basically has a liberal bias.
Fox
News Channel is the home of totally conservative ideologues.
The
Tea Parties are made up of racist bigots.
Barak
Obama wants to turn this country into a socialist-communist country.
The
country is basically polarized into conservative and liberal extremes.
This
list could go on for pages from both the liberal and the conservative sides of
the spectrum, even though that definition of liberal and conservative has
basically reversed itself in the last century.
So
really before we can answer the question whether you are normal, we must define
what normal really means.
I
donÕt think it is too extreme to say that most Americans love their country.
The crowds at Glenn BeckÕs Restoring Honor rally at the end of August and
yesterdayÕs Restoring Sanity and Fear rallies, point to that reality. If those
who think that this country is heading for some really tough times ahead and
would like to quit the American game, understand there is really no place to
go, for no matter where that might be you canÕt really get out of the American
game.
We
chose the name Cult Football for this series because contrary to the World
Series, where you watch a game while you wait for the real grass or to a lesser
extent now, the artificial grass to grow, real smash mouth American football is
the American game. In reality it is the residual of the long vanished frontier;
that allows spectators to see the foe vanquished. This violence begins with
pee-wees and continues up to the pros where the art form becomes and
established cult.
Seriously
however think for a moment about the realities of political polarization and
being center-right and you realize that if the center-right is really the
center of political thought, then it should be the center and the extremes of
the far right and the far left would be exactly that. In reality there is
nothing about the United States of America, as it exists today that is normal,
other than some somewhat universal allegiance to the seasonal game of football.
So
probably the proper question is not so much R U normal, but whether you want to
become normal, and by extension do you want the country to become more normal
in the process?
Assuming
that this is a call to some sort of normal honorable sanity, where we would
like to create a world without impending fear, where do we begin?
I
would say that to begin that transition we need to restrain the pundits on both
polarizing extremes from being the only voices that are given a voice.
Bill
OÕReilly has created the cable news standard of success through what he has
determined is Òlively debate.Ó That is basically Fox NewsÕ Òfair and balancedÓ
spiced up with a little heat, to use a cooking metaphor. However you spin the
ÒNo spin zoneÓ was not created to create consensus but rather strife and
controversy. So in the truest sense, common normality must forcefully be
divided into Pinheads and Patriots.
But
when you come down to the reality that the mainstream media is really nothing
but a propaganda conduit for the uber-liberal progressive agenda, where do you
turn? You surely are not going to get that moderation from Rush Limbaugh, Sean
Hannity, and others.
The
real mainstream view about this election is that the vast majority of the true
normal Americans have no use for either the Republicans or the Democrats, and
furthermore they really have little hope that the results of this election,
just less than 48 hours away will change any of that.
Drifting
back into real reality for a moment, the really spooky times, as we will
discuss on Wednesday, begins with the Quantitative Easing (QE) that will take
place after the Federal Reserve decides the QE extent — post election day
plus one. This will take place not through legislative auspices, but rather
under the rule of Ben Bernanke, who was trained in the debt consumerist mindset
by Alan Greenspan and is an expert in the causes of the Great Depression, but
not so much the alternative that lasted until WWII got us out of the mess.
We
live in a world in which fiat money is defined as real money wealth and faux
money cannot exist. Furthermore no national money in the world today exists in
a world of natural physics or what we call at Wonder Springs — ecological
energetics. All that really means is that globalism as it exists and is hyped
today is really just a hopeful change, pretending to be something it isnÕt, and
never can be. So the spooky times will begin whether any of the normal people
want it at all.
Truly
it is time for the normal people of this country to become normal. Ask politely
that Bill OÕReilly and other similar opinion shows, left, center, and right
politically, give equal time to normal people pundits, a new common reality
creation. It is time to seek common solutions rather than giving time to people
to find their identity in being obnoxiously different, instead of seeking
common solutions.
The
big questions in America are what will happen to the president if his Democrats
lose in a tsunami and a really big wave puts the Republicans in control?
I
heard someplace that all the federal discretionary spending is less than the
current budget deficit. Of course all that is somewhat determined by how you
define discretionary spending, which leads to the fact that you canÕt balance
any budget without real austerity and an increase in revenue through some,
perhaps radical changes.
Put
another way, in a country where 70 percent of the economy is based upon
consumer spending (much of it, at that past milepost — based upon debt
alone), 16 percent on ever expanding healthcare, and 25 percent on federal
government spending
(3721/14623=25.4% estimate in $ billions: source — usgovernmentspending.com),
spooky times are here. This is a true first for anyone alive today.
Then
when you add in the religion that says money is a god for those who control the
money supply, that money is really wealth, and it can be created through
leverage ex nihilo, by access to major financial firms, we begin to see normal
people as really someone important as we attempt to move forward.
I
for one always considered myself to be quite normal. But now that I have been
considered an extremist religious fanatic by those on both extremes of any
human spectrum you might like to invent, the whole extreme concept becomes
quite liberating. ÒNobody likes me, everybody hates me, and eating worms really
isnÕt that appetizing.Ó
Federalism,
as it currently exists in our evolving former progressing society, doesnÕt seem
to make much sense because it was somewhat evil, but rather it is a very
inefficient means of accomplishing anything. The first thing you learn about
human enterprise is every level that a product or service passes through,
generally increases the cost at least 10 percent, and more is better. That
means if you give the federal government $100 the best you can hope for in
return is $90. In reality that is true all down the line, and even those
results are dependent upon political power. The more we eliminate the
bureaucratic middle the more efficient and opportunity rich, our governance
will become.
Now
historically bankers were somewhat immune to this 10 percent rule and banks ran
on a 2-3 percent spread, because what they lacked in margin they made up in
volume. That all changed when they were freed from the need to hold the debt
assets they created and could shuffle them off, not to Buffalo, but to China,
Japan, Europe and anyone else who might believe that they really were a
security based upon a sound cash flow annuity?
If
you want to be normal as we move forward into uncharted waters (or some other
wild west metaphor) quit with the leap of blind faith. Anyone who is not
willing to look you in the eye and explain what they are doing; probably isnÕt
relying on real faith, but some means of marketing manipulation.
This,
in the media world, somewhat describes the contrasting true power of the Glenn
Beck brand. He has a new book out called ÒBroke:
The Plan to Restore Our Trust, Truth and Treasure.Ó I havenÕt purchased the
book but I did read the free chapter that his daily email linked, and checked
out the hard copy in Walmart.
I
have been passed a couple of his books from people who were given those gifts
of enlightenment by his followers. In turn, I too have passed them on to the
local library, without much more than looking through the pages, for they
seemed to me a work overseen by a recovering drunk with ADD, which even a
healthy dose of Mormonism could not overcome. ÒBrokeÓ
however seems to have developed beyond that level of juvenile talking points,
even though the teachable moments seem to still exist.
Back
in the beginning of the environmental movement when stationed in Germany,
without the benefit or curse of television, I read a lot of those early
eco-squeak books. After a number I was so bummed out on the process that I
havenÕt read any since. In essence they were 200 – 250 pages in length,
180 – 225 pages dealt with the problem, the remaining 10 percent dealt
with some shallow solution to save the world. ÒBrokeÓ
seems to be broken into thirds, history, present reality, and solutions. What
solutions I read seem to be abstract conservative talking points that have
changed little from the Reagan years.
That
means that BeckÕs book is probably what used to be called a primer for the
times that are ahead. Here at Wonder Springs we will continue with almost
everything we post running almost 2000 words written at a high school level or
slightly beyond. That makes the article demand way too much column space and
acuity to be part of any mainstream media, but with limited writing skills, it
takes me that long to tell a applicable story and not attempt to bore you into
complacency.
Anyway
as I now have so much to read, so little space for books, and have taken almost
all of my other reading to the screen, instead of paper copies, I have decided
to move most of my book reading to a soon to be purchased Kindle, so BeckÕs ÒBrokeÓ
will have to wait for that reality.
Books,
blogs, and teachable moments however, may be catalysts, but really provide none
of the energetics of change, real teaching about the real applications of
natural law and GodÕs common grace solutions to human problems do, but only if
they become part of the framework of the human enterprise landscape. Here,
within the Wonder Springs concept, we are attempting to provide those hands-on
opportunities and make them workable.
Put
in the context of how we are perceived in the world, our creationist,
primitive, knuckle dragging concepts might just be what the lowly evolved need
to make the world of better place. Surely those Social Darwinists who donÕt
quite understand the realities of the Five
Essential Gs: God — Gold — Grub — Gumption — Guns.
However such primitive learning might give them a proper context to move beyond
the talking points of academia into some normal applications that the common
folks could understand and adopt.
As
we are about to learn from this election, which includes the president of
United States of America, those who canÕt do — teach, and hence really
have little to say to the people who make the world we know operate. That until
the second coming of Jesus, or the Rapture, means the good, the bad, the ugly,
and for the spooky times we have now entered, is where being normal and all the
baggage it carries with normality, will soon be considered a true blessing of
GodÕs Providence.
©
Creative Commons License 3.0, see website for details.