The
Wonder Springs Chronicle
The
jobless times that vex the jobless soul
28
July 2010
Volume
12, Issue 30
Access
now the ÒThe
Wonder Springs ChronicleÓ Front Page. Be sure to check out the grizzly times
wisdom and fresh insights of BruteÕ Griz every Friday here at The Wonder
Springs Chronicle and every Wednesday at Deep
Woods Moola and Redux Rendezvous.
To
make a donation to the Wonder Springs community please do so at the address
below, or follow the donation links on the website.
Welcome
to jobless times that vex the jobless soul.
Welcome
to the new decade of the early twenty-first century, where the future is based
on hope. The hope that Christmas past will again invigorate Christmas present,
or the hope that Christmas future cannot come too soon. Hope, hope everywhere
and none of it changes reality, for we have no concept of reality, other than
the future hopefully repeats or improves upon the past.
Japan
has had a lost decade for the last couple, because their economy has developed
permanent stagnation. So the country that just some twenty to thirty years ago
was the business model for the world, now is just another economic player in a
global community of lethargic materialism.
Europe
for its part has done better than Japan, but it is sort of a unified Europe
after all. But in the context of world economics, it seems that the proper
concept is ÒBeen there, done that, and got the shirt.Ó They seem however
beginning to realize that loving one another, while better than war, still
doesnÕt necessarily make for a happy family.
Here
in the United States we have recently made hope our God. Well if not really a
god, hope in change seems to be a figment of perverse imagination, really
creates nothing but more regulations, present deficits, and a future of higher
taxes, coupled with either deflation or inflation.
The
past is where we feel the most comfortable, so if we all hope together that
past-future will evolve right before our eyes. Can I get a witness?
There
is a television commercial that I find very disturbing. It comes to us from the
chemical company Dupont. The essence of that commercial is that ÒWe donÕt
invent anything we just innovate.Ó When you think about it seriously and expand
the concept, innovation is what the world economic system has been doing, not
for decades, but for generations.
What
happens when innovation runs its course and we need to invent something new?
ÒWell,
invention will take care of itself!Ó
Really?
Name the last real invention that had a significant impact on the world. When
did it take place?
IÕm
a pretty creative guy, but the best and most recent I can come up with is the
personal computer. But when you investigate further you find that both
Microsoft and Apple are based upon innovations from big corporations that
either couldnÕt see into the future, or thought the enterprise avenues were not
worth the risks.
All
you need to do is to carry that mindset back another generation and you should
be able to see clearly the path that got us to the point of where we are today.
The problems in the world today all stem from relying on inventions at least a
century old, and we just hope that this material innovation will continue to
give us the perception that we are making progress.
The
problem is that truthfully nobody wants to make anything anymore; we just want
to use it. ThatÕs true with perhaps the exception of the Chinese. However if we
broaden the perspective in to philosophy we might understand that perhaps the
industrial age has run its course and hence we need to invent a new and less
materially oriented future. That reality would not make the Chinese the makers
of a new world order, but rather a humongous dinosaur.
Other
than the wishful thinking of the intellectual elite class in America, and all
the presidentÕs men and women, Marxism and socialism have pretty much run their
course. The older Scottish creation of capitalism really no longer creates
capital, but just innovatively shuffles it from one titanic to another.
My
God we have a problem that most people are unwilling to look at and it centers
on a three-letter word. That word is God! Put simply we no longer invent or
truly create anything simply because we have systematically removed the God who
created everything — from everything we hope to do. How far will we need
to fall and how long will it take before we again begin to understand that hope
in mankind to create any positive future is just a human centered theology of
glory?
As
we have said many times the things of God begin with the individual. This is
true not only with individual salvation, but with everything else. The problem
that we face today is we have done virtually everything possible to eliminate
the individual and force them to be part of some collective. That is true
whether we are talking about being a good corporate employee, to being a
bureaucrat, joining a church, to being a member of AARP. The unspoken
indicative of a good person is to be a collective member of a good group.
By
extension good people get a good job, raise their family, send the kids to
college, buy lots of stuff and invest for retirement. Then once they really are
beginning to understand how the world really works, they must retire, travel,
play golf, and pretty much spend the rest of their days being a leach on
everyone else. This is a great model, because once you know how the world
really works, you become a threat to the model itself.
The
whole institution of Wall Street is the holy temple of this way of life, for it
is Wall Street where you must invest your meager wealth, for the hope of
eventually converting it into money. Sadly, in recent years real estate has
lost its zeal, for the Fat Cats on Wall Street, in collusion with government
sponsored infinitely leveraged home loans, that were sold to Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae, are now forcing a deflation of home values that will eventually
equilibrate with the salaries you can make working your job.
To
further this holy temple of making money on Wall Street, George W. Bush sought
to create a distinct human species of Laissez-Faire Scoundrels. Sadly about six
years into his reign, Alan Greenspan retired as chairman of the Federal
Reserve, when the curtain began to be pulled back on real estate and a pending
financial crisis began to seem like a forgone conclusion to everyone —
except the good people whoÕs investments made it all possible.
Hopefully
we believed that Barack Obama would give us some change that we really could
believe in. That security would be centered on the reality that there are not
any Wall Street Fat Cats in government. However in the name of preventing
future Wall Street greed, Barack decided we would keep the power structure
responsible for the failure in place. I think the reasoning went something
along the line, ÒSince they understand the problem, they should be able to fix
the mess they helped create. Such is the wisdom of change!
Thankfully
a couple of weeks ago FED chairman Ben Bernanke essentially told Congress that
he really didnÕt know what the economic future holds, so he really doesnÕt know
what he would do to fix something that might just happen. That too is surely
reassuring?
Be
that as it may, it is widely reported for half a century that small business
owners create most of the jobs in the country. What is never reported is the rest of the equation. That is
probably true because everyone who should be looking at the net jobs, not just
the created jobs, will find that net job creation comes quite rapidly after the
birth of small businesses, thereafter jobs become static at best, and in
composite figures net job losers, just like in global capitalism.
For
the last two weeks we have repeated the mention of the study by the Kauffman
Foundation that shows that net positive jobs are only created in startup
companies. Really hopefully this third time is a charm. As far as I know the
only other person who read the report is Fran Tarkenton. Surfing through the
channels one night I mistakenly hit the Fox News button on my remote during
Hannity. On his ÒGreat American Panel, I recognized the football legend. The
subject of the discussion was job creation and taxes. Blah, blah, blah! Fran
began to speak and said, ÒThree million jobs are created each year by startup
businesses, one million are lost by all the rest.Ó
Shucky
darn, I am not alone after all! Sadly, Sean then burst into one of his
bloviating talking points about how it is better to be rich and not pay taxes.
Which, as usual with Sean, had absolutely nothing to do with anything else the
other panel members had been saying.
The
government Census Bureau data used in the Kauffman Report begins in 1977 and
goes forward to 2005. I for one would like to speculate that since most of this
data is from the time of decreasing marginal tax rates, and inversely a
decrease in tax avoidance business development opportunities. What would that
jobs data look like for the previous years of the century? Therefore that
speculation is that many more jobs were created by startups during that earlier
period and perhaps even established businesses may have added some jobs.
That
would show that the Reagan era tax cuts, at least as it pertains to job
creation was really Voodoo Economics and furthermore trickle down is really
just a trickle, or a trick.
Seriously however and moving beyond my speculation, what is really happening
is that from its inception, AmericaÕs progressive tax system does not so much
provide for free market enterprise, but rather picks winners and losers,
thereby producing a net effect of weakening the entire country — both
enterprise and government.
To
eliminate the continued weakening of already anemic economic conditions, Russia
instituted a Flat Tax
in 2001 that currently stands at 13 percent. Follow the Flat Tax
link to learn more about a true enterprise inducement instead of regressive
tax structure.
Putting
this into a historic global context, that you may not find opined anywhere
else; for the last 100 years the United States of America has been continually
experimenting with two Social Darwinist elitist taxation propositions, which
closely models two prevailing old century economic systems.
The
oldest, and also currently the American vogue, is the Marxist – socialism
Collectivist Elitist model in which the government takes all the wealth and
redistributes it to the poor, taking a healthy cut for itself and the state
sponsored non benevolent bureaucracy, giving handouts to their crony friends,
and letting the rest trickle down in the name of social justice.
Beginning
in the Reagan Revolution and continuing through Bush 43, was the application of
Objectivism of the Laissez-Faire Scoundrels, that says if humans cast their
fate with basically good karma, good things will happen for all, but especially
if you have access to capital in any form. However debt leveraged capital is
best, because it reduces individual risk and lets the rest trickle down in the
name of material consumerism.
Through
all the smoke and mirrors and the manipulations of the wizard behind the
screen, we were told that those in charge knew what they were doing and in the
process the American Dream of the pursuit of happiness would be fulfilled
without having to work for it. Those truly willing to be entrepreneurs and take
the risk to invent something need not apply, because their work was risky and
risk is something to avoid like the plague — or better yet, is the
plague.
As
a result all inventions evolved into innovation and the unique American species
that we introduced in Redux
Rendezvous IV of the Independenceus arduous was cultivated out
of all the enterprise fields.
But
just as the Marxist Collective Elitists survived in academia from the 1970s,
through the Reagan Revolution unto the election of messianic Obama, the seeds
of the wild effrontery of the common named Liberty Bell have been scattered
all across the land by the providence of the Divine. The variety characteristics of this now very rare apple are
reproduced below.
Independenceus arduous: (Liberty Bell)
Difficult to establish, once established requires little care, can live for
centuries, roots fix nitrogen from the air much like legumes, but also converts
other minerals into plant available nutrients, the fruit looks unremarkable,
but the fruit has long term effects on humans making them hardworking,
generous, and seems to produce lasting happiness in desert conditions.
Business
development is really a trade best learned through agronomy and natural
ecology. Since the 1980s we have called this Business Ecology, Enterprise
Symbiosis, and probably the most descriptive MŽtis Phylogenesis. A simple
outline of these natural law principles and common sense will be found by following
the Leadership Tab above, which will take you to our sister site of The Creation
Leadership Center. The Phylogenesis Tab (direct link) there will take
you to that outline.
Jobs,
jobs, jobs, these truly jobless creation times are the vexation of the jobless
soul. What makes it worse is virtually everything currently being proposed by
those who self-righteously use myths they have heard repeated so often, that
they assume they are truths, is that crucial contextual reasoning is being
thrown into a wind of blathering noise.
What
this nation needs is first and foremost is to make the choice that to continue
on the present path really provides no sustainable future. That path has become
a highway for a generation and all we have really done is change lanes from
time to time.
America
became great, because it birthed inventors and the entrepreneurs of the world.
To build that nation again, we need to build a twenty-first century foundation,
with the building blocks of individual freedom, liberty, equal justice, and
lest we forget equal access to capital. That is a job we can all take part and
eventually we all will receive our reward, and some of it may be in the form of
money. More importantly that building will represent, who we are, and what we
believe. For this is the right and the privilege the Creator has given to
humanity, and it is God who will provide the resources.
©
Creative Commons License 3.0, see website for details.