The
Wonder Springs Chronicle
The
WorldÕs Coming Grace Infusion
13
December 2010
The
American Cult Football world learned early Sunday Morning that the roof of the
inflatable Metrodome in Minneapolis collapsed canceling the NFL meeting of the
Minnesota Vikings and the New York Giants. Could this be the beginning of some
emerging threat to the religion of millions, perhaps billions worldwide?
Well
it is probably a little too much to proclaim that this event happened for some
great religious reason. However in a world in which every human has a religion,
whether they admit it or not, for some their religion has become football,
especially the football of the National Football League. After all the Super
Bowl is one of the most watched events of the year.
Furthermore
this roof collapse has strategic importance as it relates to the consecutive
game starts by Bret Favre, which currently stands at a league record 297 games.
A Monday game now to be played in Detroit probably means a continuation of BretÕs
streak.
Sunday
also means that the United States is still the most churched nation in history
and many Americans will make the Sunday trek to church no matter the weather.
Whether you attribute the recently uncharacteristic weather we have been
experiencing worldwide to global warming or regular weather and climate
variability, when you come right down to it, weather is the great world
phenomena we humans would like to control, because it continually points to the
reality that we canÕt (control the weather).
It
is fitting, because of the title of this article, that this weather variability
points to the reality that Americans are the worldÕs largest, most culturally
diverse religious culture. All of this religion has come about because of some
political-technical-religious term we call the, Òseparation of church and
state.Ó
While
AmericanÕs are quite diverse in the naming of their faith, there is still a
common Christian thread that makes up this religion. Recently it has become
known as Òmoral therapeutic deism.Ó This really isnÕt all that much different
than Benjamin FranklinÕs definition of ÒHeaven helps those who help
themselves.Ó
What
makes all this more interesting is that Franklin combined with Thomas Jefferson
proposed an image for the great seal of the United States that included Exodus
symbolism of Moses, the Red Sea passage, and the pillar of fire that led the
Jewish people through the wilderness to the Promised Land.
Into
that firelight we are told on one hand that the founders of the American
republic were at best passive deists. On the other hand we hear that most of
these men were devout Christians that were attempting to create a shining city
on a hill, the eternal Jerusalem here on earth.
All
this misses the real point, theologically best described by Augustine as the
City of God in contrast with the City of Man. These city metaphors basically
describe two kingdoms within the human desire to bring down heaven here to
earth, essentially in the form of a city. This city however is best described
as the city of Babylon in Genesis Chapter 11.
Bringing
that into a present context, we have an atheistic Babylon and a Deistic
Babylon. It is our cultural belief that both are evolving toward that human
goal of saving ourselves by our own merits. The atheistic evolutionary model
looks toward some sort of collective community that can get it put together, if
we just all believe. The Deistic model is loosely based upon the Biblical law
given to Moses on Mt. Sinai.
This
surely should lead everyone to pray, ÒGod deliver us from this dumbed down
world of sound bites, political spin, and gross materialism. Give us a world in
which we can again find peace and joy amongst all the chaos and incessant
noise.Ó
Before
we could truly form this prayer, we can now vaguely see that this change in reality
is coming forth in this land and around the world.
I
recently began reading ÒBonhoeffer
— Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy.Ó I would have to say it is a welcome change
to read a book written by someone who can create a piece of literature, rather
than just a contemporary book. You donÕt read this biography in a few hours,
but rather it is a journey through the life of a man whose martyred life has
profound applications to the United States and the world today.
Towards
the end of his life, while isolated in a concentration camp, Bonhoeffer begins
corresponding with a friend about Religionless Christianity. The context of these letters is basically
not some form of humanistic religion, without the saving work and justification
of Jesus Christ, but rather about a confessing church that rids itself of
humanistic religion. This Christianity without religion focuses specifically on
the historic confessions of the true nature of historic orthodox Christianity.
Pretty
much most of my adult life in Christianity, I have been associated with
churches that essentially believe not in the common historic practices of the
Christian religion, but rather a more spiritual concept generally defined as
Òrelationship.Ó
I
have discovered however, there is a tendency to make that relationship
Christianity another religion as well. Put in a more succinct way, both take
you back to a ritual law defined as Òdead religionÓ or a Gnostic reality of the
same law given at Sinai. Together, just as with true Old Testament law, the
responsibility remains on me.
What
we really see in the context of Augustine, is that the City of God moves into
the City of Man and while people tend to argue the evils of dead religion,
contrasted with the life in the spirit, they become polar opposites of the
wisdom of dead doctrine contrasted with personal experience.
We
canÕt throw out these paradigms or prejudices of the human personality, but
perhaps it is a good time to look at a different context that may help us see,
in BonhoefferÕs concept, a less noisy, less chaotic tension of Religionless
Christianity. To do that we must begin by restating the sources of human
inspiration which form the basis of all our religions.
Rather
than use AugustineÕs tale of two cities, it is much better to use a concept of
two revelations. In Christianity one revelation is designated as common to all
humans, which may include scientific natural laws as well as generally understood
laws of morals and decency. These standards reflect that humans were created by
God, as the highest form of GodÕs creation, and we still maintain a certain
residual of that created goodness. While other peoples hold somewhat different
worldviews and creation evolutionary accounts, all people share a very complex
human nature.
A
specific special revelation of Christianity is that mankind made the choice to
reject GodÕs sovereignty and rebel, where Christians use the term original sin,
but other religions use other terms to describe this source and reality of evil
among humanity. All religions have varying specific revelations about how or
what a person may do after this present life.
Religionless
Christianity basically rests upon the precepts of the legal propitiatory offering
of Jesus of Nazareth as the fully human — fully God, sinless sacrifice
for the redemption and justification of humanity before our Creator. Only Christianity has the concept of
this type of graceful understanding, as a free gift of salvation to enter into
eternal life, or make your life count during this journey we call life. All
other religions rest upon some form of law keeping, or human based ability.
Now
let us put these two concepts into a somewhat different creation paradigm than
what you have heard in church. We really donÕt know for sure whether the
founding fathers of the American Republic were the Religionless Christians
because we have always interpreted their actions in terms of our contemporary religious
views.
For
example Thomas Jefferson took all the miracles out of the Bible and created
what we today call the Jefferson Bible. Those who state Jefferson was a deist do
so on the basis of the Bible that bears his name and hence they believe he personally
didnÕt believe in Christianity in the historic redemptive sense. However the
context of JeffersonÕs creation of his Bible was really a common or natural
rendition of the Bible without the miracles to provide a means to teach
Judeo-Christian values to the native Indians. To infer from this that Jefferson
truly was not a Christian requires a leap of faith of another presupposition of
another religion.
Similar
instances can be found for many other founding fathers, but especially George
Washington. The point that our current religious spinners would like you to
believe is that the founders didnÕt know what they were doing, and we in our
exalted historical hindsight can dictate reality the way we want history to
justify our concepts and ideas of our specific religion.
How
about this open-minded concept: The founders of the United States of America
desired to create a secular nation based upon common Judeo-Christian values
that they all understood and most believed to be true. They also understood, something
that are petty narcissism canÕt comprehend, they believed that each person
responded to the enlightenment he or she received and hence God was the
ultimate judge of how we lived our lives. This was first and foremost a common
declaration of especially Benjamin Franklin himself. Humans were not created to
be judges of one another, other than in the constructs of common human
instituted law. How far has our legalism transgressed this founding American
Absolute?
Putting
this in a somewhat specific Christian worldview. The Bible doesnÕt speak of a
shining city on a hill except of a New Jerusalem at the end of the Book of
Revelation. Over time many Christians and cults have wanted to help God out in
that endeavor and hence bring about through human will, the end of the present
age, and essentially teach those ÒsinnersÓ that our religion was right and
theirs was wrong.
However
the Bible does speak to a ÒKingdom of God.Ó In the English Standard Version
there are sixty-seven results for the term in quotation, all in the New
Testament. Fifty-three are found in the four gospels, six in Acts, one each in
Romans, Galatians, Colossians, and 2 Thessalonians, and four in I Corinthians.
All of these citations were either made by Jesus himself, or refer to the finished
work of Jesus — his death on the cross for manÕs sins, and his
resurrection from the dead.
From
this we can somewhat infer that this Kingdom of God has been coming about
through time for essentially two thousand years. If we look at human progress
over that time, which we all believe is true, what we really see is a few
strategic changes. First of all there are more people alive today than ever in
history. Furthermore we are all tied together by this sort of Babylonian model
of global enterprise. The one that God grandly remodeled a long time ago, but
that doesnÕt keep we humans from trying to resurrect our own economic and
religious savior. Finally most common human revelation absolutes are by their
nature morally neutral. That is to say that they can be used for either the
betterment of mankind or for the evil exploitation of our human attributes.
So
this world we have thought we have been systematically developing and
exploiting over history, has developed simultaneously, within the constructs of
Divine Providence the ÒKingdom of GodÓ Two thousand years ago, an infusion of
GodÕs grace occurred in a small country in what we call the Middle East. In a
couple of weeks a holiday we call Christmas, celebrates the birth of the
Messiah of the Jews and the Savior of mankind. That country viewed itself as a
very religious place, occupied by very religious people. But if we look at
those New Testament Kingdom of God teachings, they were really the antithesis
of JudeaÕs contemporary formal religious thought.
We
too are living in such a time; Dietrich Bonhoeffer lived and became a martyr in
humanitiesÕ latest fascist world model. Religionless Christianity shows a
similar opportunity by understanding afresh that two thousand year old
principle of the Kingdom of God, the grace infusion into our world. GodÕs
infusion with Òcostly graceÓ is now beginning. This is strongly tensioned with
the Òcheap graceÓ that has become a slowly spreading form of human entropy
since that last infusion two millennia ago.
In
the fullness of time long ago, when selfish sinful mankind had reach the
precipice of total collapse, an infusion of GodÕs grace occurred and created
the common energetic informational structure to build what we call our modern
world. That redemptive infusion occurred once, for all time.
We
do not need to go to the mountaintop to wait for the return of the Lord, for
the Kingdom of God is at hand. Our problem is that we have been looking for it
through various religious laws instead of the infusion of Divine Providential
grace. There are those out in the world who will take your money, sell you a
book, and take you places to find the answer. But the answer comes from the
place where we least expect it, for we have been looking in all the wrong
places. A search of the New Testament ÒKingdom
of GodÓ will give you some hints.
Psalm
46:10 states it best: "Be
still, and know that I am God. I will be exalted among the nations, I will be
exalted in the earth!"
©
Creative Commons License 3.0, see website for details.