Humpty Dumpty in a New
Century
16 December 2009
Volume 11, Issue 49
Access now the ÒThe Wonder Springs ChronicleÓ Front Page.
To make a donation to the
Wonder Springs community please do so at the address below, or follow the
donation links on the website.
Humpty
Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty
Dumpty had a great fall;
All the
king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again.
We move from our fairy tale ÒA Christmas HuntÓ between Teddy Roosevelt
and Al Gore in our Monday post to a real for goodness sake nursery rhyme. Those
people of the English language persuasion all learned this short stanza as
young children. According to the Internet it has been with us over two
centuries. Humpty Dumpty has been used in various times and places to make a
point about society, but really has been pretty much accepted in its monarchial
reality. For most of this history it has been assumed that Humpty Dumpty was an
egg that would surely break if he/it fell off a wall, and the wall was –
just a wall.
No matter how you spin the rhyme, there are dire consequences
when something or someone falls off a wall. In the case of Humpty Dumpty the
result of his fall was death. In the news of the world today there are a number
of spins on the current state of Humpty Dumpty as it relates to current or
pending realities. This is especially true in the United States, where a lot of
people have too much time to analyze the past, report on the present, and
prognosticate about the future. To name a few:
Humpty Dumpty fell off the wall during the presidency of
George W. Bush.
President Obama is well on the way of putting Humpty Dumpy
back together again.
President Obama attempted to take away the freedom of
Humpty Dumpty to sit on his wall, he built through hard work and freedom and
this resulted in HumptyÕs death. This is definitely a Federal government
attempt to acquire the Dumpty Wall for some sort of redistribution of wealth
scheme.
What is never questioned in any of the above scenarios is
that Humpty Dumpty reality exists today in what we would call a totally secular
world or worldview.
As we pointed out in last weekÕs post asking, ÒGod if you are
real?Ó could that God reality change our and Humpty DumptyÕs worldview? In this
respect Humpty Dumpty would only ask that question after he fell off the wall.
But it also follows that if Òall the kingÕs horses and all the kingÕs men canÕt
put Humpty Dumpty together again,Ó then is the future hopeless for Humpty
Dumpty, if he must rely only on a natural king; rather than the King of kings?
Of course the answers to the God question above echo pretty
much the same theme, ÒHumpty Dumpty, the future is great if you donÕt lie
there in pieces, put your life together.Ó
And again in our secular world we get similar spin:
Humpty, can I call you the Hump Man? If you accept Jesus
into your heart, He will put you back together, and you will own another wall
and be a king, not with a capital K, just a small k.
Humpty Dumpty, it is the governmentÕs responsibility to
put you together, so we will provide you with the resources to be a good egg
again, especially since all eggs look pretty much alike.
Mr. Dumpty you are on your own kid, you are just a coward,
a real American is self-sufficient and ÒdonÕt need no help from no one.Ó (sic)
Notice the triple negative, which seems to imply that resources will not be
forthcoming, no matter how Humpty Dumpty asks for help.
So let us
dissect old Humpty Dumpty in early twenty-first century terms and see if all
the parts are sufficient to give us a real rhyme that may be applicable to
those who have been, are now experiencing, or will soon be living a Humpty
Dumpty life.
First of
all we must look at Humpty Dumpty himself. While it has always been assumed the
Humpty was an egg, eggs really are pretty thin skinned, any slight adverse
happenstance and they fall all apart. Besides in the twenty-first century we
have a better term ÒeggheadÓ which gives Humpty sort of an elitist, but
somewhat pejorative personality. That probably comes from the fact that he
might not be all that stable mentally. He seems to be quite emotional in that
his life is full of humpy highs and dumpy lows.
So for some
reason Mr. Dumpty decided to go sit on a wall. As we pointed out earlier,
Humpty could have built that wall. If that was the case sitting on a wall of
your own description really doesnÕt seem to be all that important. No, this
wall must be associated with some deeper, or in this case a higher metaphysical
application. We would have to assume the wall then is associated with the
politically correct evolving progressive culture. That seems to be what we in
the west are demanding in our current wall building enterprises, as we move
onward and upward.
These walls
are first and foremost a human definable and solvable need, like they are now
working on in Copenhagen, to save the world from the soon coming catastrophe of
global warming climate change. So in the metaphysical sense, the Humpty Wall
could exist anywhere people are attempting to create a kinder and more gentile
society, and help all those people who canÕt help themselves; price is not a
consideration. So Mr. Dumpty could mount an erected wall in Copenhagen,
Chicago, Wall Street and/or Manhattan, Washington DC, Paris, London, Beijing,
Singapore, pretty much in any of the worldÕs leading cities. Apologies to those
world-class cities we left out.
Humpty
could not mount a wall out in the wilderness, or even in the deep woods,
because just like a tree falling in the forest, which makes no sound, Humpty
falling off a wall outside a major media center would never be noticed. It
would not be all that long and HumptyÕs innards would feed the critters and the
bugs and his nature would return to the earth from which it came. Furthermore
in the context of the rhyme all the kingÕs horses and all the kingÕs men would
not be available out in the forest, for they never venture to anywhere that the
kingÕs authority can come into question.
In any
construct, mounting the wall would give Humpty a wider view of life and the
kingÕs subjects beneath his perusal. But sadly there is no explanation in the
rhyme why Humpty fell off the wall.
Therefore we are left to speculate.
Mr. Dumpty
must have been a pretty important person to merit the kingÕs attention. He
could have decided to commit suicide, but then the rhyme would have said Humpty
jumped off the wall. No this must have been some sort of accident. The question
must then be, ÒDid Humpty take some daring risk, or was something wrong with
the wall itself?
The answer
seems pretty straightforward, it must have been something wrong with the wall
itself, for Humpty was sitting on the wall, not walking along the wall, or some
other risky option. Furthermore it must have not been some so called act of
God, because if this were the case, then there would have been some sort of
Humpty bargain with God to plead for his salvation. Like in the life of Martin
Luther, ÒGod if you save me from this storm, I will go to the monastery to
become a monk, and after that you can use me to start the Protestant
Reformation.Ó
Our
scientific analysis of the wall materials and the foundation shows that the
foundation was built on sand, which contributed greatly to the total
instability of the wall itself, but we also found that the rocks that were used
to build the wall were not as well fitted together as the king himself had
requested. Then the rocks themselves were suspect as far as it comes to their
structural integrity. They just could not bear the weight of a humble egghead
because of all those who used the wall to promote their agendas and had
campaigned on both sides of the wall for a very long time. As a consequence the
rocks fractured and fell apart just at the time poor Humpty decided to try to
overcome his fears of being just a Humpty – Dumpty sort of a guy.
Finally, we
come to the fault of all the kingÕs horses and all the kingÕs men, who could
not put Mr. Dumpty together again. Now we have two possible explanations why
this occurred that bear striking application to our day and why this rhyme is
so important.
First of
all the kingÕs men were called upon to do a job they were not all that
qualified to do. They were advisors to the king and therefore knew a lot of
very important things, or better yet a lot of things that were important to the
king. Hence they never seemed to understand that Mr. DumptyÕs demise was not
due to personal mistakes, but rather the king himself had and was trying to
create a kingdom wall, without an understanding of the natural laws that govern
all things. It doesnÕt take a rocket scientist to understand that you canÕt
build a sustainable wall on sand, but it does take some common sense. In all
their training to become a kingÕs horse or a kingÕs man, they somehow forgot that
they too were subject to the eternal laws of nature and natureÕs God.
In an
effort to surround his kingdom so that his reputation would last forever, the
king had decided to enact, with great support from his lords and governors, a
massive wall-building stimulus. The problem was that all the shovel ready
wall-building projects, really were not all that ready to be built and Humpty
Dumpty was unfortunate enough to test his sitting ability on one of those early
walls.
This brings
us to the true moral of the story. In the moral both Humpty Dumpty and the king
are at fault, sadly Humpty Dumpty paid for this moral with his life, and the
king, well he was the king after all. Humpty Dumpty believed that all the
kingÕs horses and all the kingÕs men could build a wall on which he could sit
securely and enjoy the view.
Readers,
understand this is not at all like the current ObamaCare that the United States
Congress is trying to force upon the American people. No it isnÕt, because the
king said that this had been the goal of generations of kings.
Furthermore
Humpty Dumpty should have realized that all the kings horseÕs and all the
kingÕs men were vested and invested heavily in the success of all the kingÕs
projects, not just building the kingÕs walls, but green energy, climate change,
and a whole host of their other pet projects that the king also wanted to
happen. These stimulus projects further eroded the foundation of not only the
kingÕs wall projects, but also every structure in the kingÕs reign. The KingÕs
Men were the movers and shakers of change they could believe in, and the phrase
was so catchy Humpty Dumpty believed it until his death.
Soon after
Humpty Dumpty died, the kings reign became greatly imperiled because of all the
kingÕs pet projects. There was simply no money left for the kingÕs subjects to
create jobs, and improve their lot in life. The king told his Fat Cat Bankers
that they needed to lend more money to the small businesses that made the
kingÕs land the most prosperous in history. They really did not refuse to lend,
but again reevaluated their risk and understood that the kingÕs concepts were
unsustainable.
In common
sense terms the king did not realize that Fat Cat Bankers canÕt make enough
money doing their old fashion job description, namely loaning money on a narrow
margins to those who say they need it. Not only that, the king had created a
money trading scheme where those bad Fat Cats, could trade money with other Fat
Cats, making money just on the trades themselves. In a process called
investment banking, they could remain Fat Cats and still associate with the
kingÕs own Fat Cats and they became more richer and richer until a time when a
universal principles became self evident to the kingÕs subjects. In common
terms these principles went something like this:
We hold
these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal and they are
endowed by nature and natureÕs God, with certain inalienable rights. Those
rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but are expanded to
the right to create lasting communities, and to defend all these God given
rights to whatever extent required, the right to create wealth from financial
liquidity and hard work, to die with dignity, and to worship their Creator
within the universal blessing of human life itself.
In that
true life story Humpty Dumpty is just no longer a nursery rhyme, but his life
becomes a principle by which gumption was created in all citizens of the kingÕs
land and in kingdomÕs around the world. That determination was fused with a
faith in GodÕs redeeming grace. Together they overcame all human obstacles to
produce not an utopian heaven on earth, but a just society in which worldly
racism disappeared within the remarkable diversity of the redeemed human
family.
It was
again celebrated in the land a festival called Christmas, where human darkness
became subject to GodÕs plan for truth and illumination, and that light again
miraculously changed misery into true prosperity.
© Creative Commons License
3.0, see website for details.