Three Medicines
15 July 2009
Volume 11, Issue 28
Access now the ÒThe Wonder
Springs ChronicleÓ Front Page: http://www.wondersprings.org
To make a donation to the
Wonder Springs community please do so at the address below, or follow the
donation links on the website.
PDF link http://www.wondersprings.org/pastarchives/2009pdfflies/files/3medicines071509.pdf
HTML view http://www.wondersprings.org/pastarchives/2009printfiles/files/3medicines071509.htm
Somewhat building on last
weekÕs discussion of hummingbirds as a natural model for humans in this new
century, this week we will attempt to break down that model into three specific
paradigms. Paradigm is a pretty generic concept that today we would probably
call worldviews. In the past and spun through western culture they would
probably call them three religions. Broadening the concept and making it, what
we the enlightened would call primitive or not evolved, those indigenous
peoples would probably call them three medicines.
This concept came to mind as
I was reading a book on the Protestant Reformation. In that book Person A says
to Person B, ÒYou know there are two religions present in this world. One
religion is true Christianity, which rests entirely upon the unmerited grace of
the Savior, Jesus Christ and His life, death, and resurrection to provide
justification for a personÕs righteousness before God. The second religion, and
much more popular, is one in which people perform all sorts of good works by
which they think they can merit GodÕs generosity to save them from eternal
damnation.Ó
At the conclusion of that
statement Person B agrees with Person A. In this particular example the first religion
referred to those who were part of the reformation medicine, while the second
religion, or medicine referred to the papists, which we would call Roman
Catholics.
What the historical context
of this conversation shows is the subtle ascendancy through time of another
worldview, religion, or medicine as old as human life itself. The Bible speaks
to it in the Book of Genesis as the ÒFall of Man.Ó That story begins in Chapter
3 and is the underlying theme throughout the rest of the whole Bible. That
medicine, promoted by the serpent, is the human desire not so much to be
religious, but to be the author of religion, to become God personified.
Therefore in the flow of
time and the development of human culture, we see in the light of human
evolution the upward progress of humanity developing from three medicines at
the beginning, to two medicines during the Reformation, until today the model
to be emulated, as the highest and best representation of humanity, is our
unique personal godliness. We have no need for a savior, for we will save
ourselves, both individually and collectively. There remains only the medicine
of the self-deified of our own enlightenment.
So why do we need to discuss
three medicines rather than just a discussion of worldviews, or religions?
The reason is quite simple.
In our age, worldviews are totally pluralistic. Everyone has a worldview. You
have yours; I have mine. The followers of Islam have theirs. In India and China
– they are just another form of the human diversity of worldviews. If we
would only just accept passively each otherÕs worldview, we would achieve world
peace, prosperity, and the human animal would finally reach the zenith of the
evolutionary continuum.
That surely is the
prescription of today, for the curing of societyÕs ills. There is only one
major problem of that medicine. That problem is all those other people groups
are not like us. The summary is best described in the toast to human
achievement, ÒHereÕs to you; and here is to me, may we never disagree. But in
case we do; to hell with you, hereÕs to me.Ó
So in the economic sense
those who need to go to hell are either those Òcapitalists,Ó or those
Ògovernment progressives.Ó The good thing, or the bad thing, is hell is just an
invention of some of those more primitive and not highly evolved worldviews
– those religious people. Once those religious people are eliminated from
the gene pool, then society will be cured and we will no longer need cultural
medicine.
The problem then is as long
as there is one other person on the face of the earth; there will be Òthe
them.Ó The them of the medicine of worldviews doesnÕt solve the impossible
quest for us to all live in harmony. We, the enlightened, know how to do that
quite well, just let everyone else understand their lower evolutionary place.
Of course the enlightened are the solution, not the problem.
So except for the
evolutionary enlightened, everyone else should plainly see that the medicine of
passive worldviews has really no standard by which a real worldview
civilization can actually function. Hence we must return to the medicines of
our Reformation persons to see if they give us a possibility of a real unity in
diversity.
Back in those olden days of
the Reformation, the concept of hell and heaven were understood to be totally a
reality of the future world. The goal of virtually everyone was to go to heaven
and not to hell, by whatever means it might take. That is probably true
essentially because the present was truly a daily struggle, at least by todayÕs
standards, and that future was where just rewards were given to us and
punishments given to those bad other people.
The Reformation however was
a European event. But in the rest of the world a formalized religious structure
also dominated the community, society, or civilization. One human constant
dominated those religions, which we are today unwilling to accept. In the
medieval civilization, or its similar counterpart in the rest of the world,
those who took the evolving worldview medicine, as we understand it, were
eliminated from the gene pool.
Some of that gene cleansing
had to do with the true scientific principle of natural selection. In those
days in order to be a member of your social class you had to actually work to
be a member of that social class. If you were unwilling to contribute tangibly
to the community you were not treated as special in a positive sense but were
ostracized from all society. That was true no matter your role in life, from
serf to the emperor, or even the pope.
At Wonder Springs we write a
lot about natural energetics. In that light in those less developed cultures,
that which did not contribute to the sustainable energetics of the specific
community was eliminated because true survival required it. Today a lot of the
nonsense we hear promoted to build, maintain, or renew our communities, must be
understood not only in the sense of prosperity, but more importantly the
surplus of cheap energy. Once that energy equilibrium shifts, culture needs to
shift also, or prosperity will suffer needlessly. That is not a worldview that
is simply a natural law.
Bring this up in an
enlightened conversation and the enlightened quickly show the reality of their
societal surplus. The truly enlightened, by nature of their intellect, need to
be pampered by their very nature; hence their work is always positive and
uplifting for them and has only enjoyable physical labor involved, like working
out at the health club.
Human logic dictates that
you need to work and contribute to your culture to survive. Any true
advancement and the resulting increase in wealth stems from the more efficient
application of information and energy. In that respect muskets quickly dominate
bows, arrows, or blowguns. In that we quickly understand the exploitation of
western culture around the world, but also for Native American peoples the
introduction of the horse and the gun, also made their lives easier and much
more productive almost immediately.
However if we just look at
the technology we miss the true medicine that drove the drive. When your
culture is immersed in creation you must live with the reality of natural law,
but you also understand the beauty of common grace. Borrowing from last weekÕs
concept of hummingbirds, outwardly we see really little utilitarian value in a
bird that weighs very little. But without their presence in forested regions
the diversity of many plants, that supply hummingbird nectar, would not
survive. Feeder or no feeder you quickly understand that there is a grand
design to it all. Furthermore that design is complex and magnificently
beautiful. The effect of it all is a tension between awesome power and tranquil
peace.
While driving last week I
pulled up behind some compact vehicle with two bumper stickers placed well
above the bumper so that everyone could see. The first sticker was basically a
worldview sticker we discussed earlier. The second was a specific quote from Gandhi,
which essentially states: ÒI have no problem with Christ, but I do have a
problem with Christians.Ó
If we use the second
medicine from our earlier Reformation example, what Gandhi and this person were
saying was that Christians today for the most part fall into the camp of the
works righteousness medicine. Put more bluntly, from outward appearances, most
Protestant Christians are more works righteous than most papists or Roman
Catholics.
Last December we did a
series of articles and posts relating to a couple of books, ÒQuitting ChurchÓ
by Julia Duin and ÒChristless ChristianityÓ by Michael Horton. The emphasis in
the books and the articles is that people are voluntarily leaving or are being
forced out of all types of Protestant churches because todayÕs ÒChristiansÓ
have a different understanding of ChristianityÕs medicine than what caused the
Reformation five hundred years ago. Generally speaking modern evangelicals are
more zealous for their good works than Roman Catholics, but yet lack the
religious doctrines that even in their cultic view - Mormons would find grossly
simplistic.
Has todayÕs Christianity
really just become a modern, or post-modern worldview medicine? The answer
probably is yes definitely, with limited exemptions!
The essence of the third
medicine is that all human beings have a problem with Jesus Christ, the Creator
of the universe, savior of fallen humanity, and eventually restorer of the
unblemished unity in diversity of natural creation and all of life.
Gandhi, the person in the
car, all worldview adherents, evangelicals, Mormons, Moslems, all religions,
you and I believe we should be able to save ourselves (and the world) by our
selfish good works. Today until we realize that ainÕt going to happen there is
not going to be any lasting economic recovery. The world of global consumer
prosperity has run out of gas and all the funny money liquidity that
governments can create is not going to change that reality.
Christianity divorced from
the Creator will not and is not succeeding. Just like politicians, too many
pastors have a vested interest in the material world, either through worldly
appropriations or with the hope of being translated from the material into the
spiritual.
For a brief period during
the Reformation there was a basic understanding that without grace from God we
are all doomed. There still is a remnant of that amazing Grace, but before it
can work, we all need to understand the common heritage of Òa wretch like me.Ó
There is one medicine that
does cure all the ills of humanity, that is Jesus the Christ, who didnÕt not
consider his station as God to be the ultimate, but became a human being, and
offered his life, so that we might understand one day the true gift of the
union of natural life and spiritual life.
That is big medicine because
in that form of Christianity race and human religion disappear, humility is
continually ascendant, and religion, as we understand it, disappears and in its
stead a visible and invisible unity in diversity transcends all of creation.
One day there will occur
that final hour when this medicine will be applied, no prophet will foresee its
coming, but the whole working of universal time – space – matter
reality will become apparent, and to those who have taken the medicine of
unmerited grace it will be a stupendous gift. For those who rest upon their
assurance of the other medicines, it will be a sorry time. For at that time the
oneness of the one true Divine Nature of a United and Diverse Trinity will be
visibly revealed.
Ultimately thatÕs all there
is folks.
© 2009 under Creative
Commons License 3.0, see website for details.