Twenty-first century
feudalism
3 June 2009
Volume 11, Issue 22
Access now the ÒThe Wonder
Springs ChronicleÓ Front Page: http://www.wondersprings.org
To make a donation to the
Wonder Springs community please do so at the address below, or follow the
donation links on the website.
PDF link
http://www.wondersprings.org/pastarchives/2009pdfflies/files/21stfeudalism060309.pdf
HTML view http://www.wondersprings.org/pastarchives/2009printfiles/files/21stfeudalism060309.htm
Last Sunday Christianity
marked the historic festival of Pentecost. While long disconnected from the
Jewish rendition of the same, Pentecost Sunday is recognized as the birthday of
the church. Churches with worship roots in a formal liturgy, focus upon three
Biblical readings each Sunday, one from the Old Testament, one New Testament,
and a Gospel reading. In Protestant circles these readings date at least from
the Reformation, but probably the readingÕs roots go much further back, perhaps
to even before the schism between Rome and the Orthodox. These Pentecost Sunday
readings shared in many denominations are: Old - Ezekiel 37:1-14; New - Acts
2:1-21; Gospel - John15:26,27; 16:4b-15. For those seeking a more contemporary
addition, the song, ÒRushing Wind,Ó by Steve Green, is found on iTunes sung by
Steve and other artists.
If you read these passages,
within the construct of what is happening currently in the worldÕs financial
turmoil, they seem totally in sync with how our reliance upon our own knowledge
and wisdom, from all the best and finest, is dismally inadequate in its
comprehension of present reality.
We have written specifically
about the Ezekiel passage in ÒDry
Bones ValleyÓ in November 2007 (PDF
link), as well as mentioned it briefly in other articles. In that article
we built upon how the passage refers to the restoration of national Israel
which took place in the mid-twentieth century, and it also should apply to the
restoration of the church, which currently finds its glory not in God, but in
the affairs and riches of the world, not much different than the nation of
Israel in EzekielÕs day. If you combine the two restoration principles you find
them, discussed amazingly in Romans 11, where in order for we Òwild olivesÓ to
be grafted in, the olive tree must first be restored.
Just as we can look back in
the Bible and see applications and the reality of today, in similar fashion we
can see parallels in common grace or the society as a whole. Conservative
pundits have been calling President Obama a socialist from the time he became a
candidate up to the present. From pretty much is inauguration the term fascism,
as been added to describe his developing regime. On some occasions even the
word communist has been used. An interesting article in the English version of
Pravda used the term Marxism to describe the whole current American scheme. ÒAmerican
capitalism gone with a whimperÓ is well worth the read.
From the liberal side of the
political spectrum and much of the general population however still give the
President high or glowing marks for his ability to Ònot let this crisis go to
wasteÓ as Òyou ainÕt seen nothing yet,Ó to use the PresidentÕs own words.
What seems to be missing in
all of this however is really a touch with the complex reality of the whole
situation, and tying it into history, a history in which President Obama is
just the current player in a line, much like the Pravda article describes. To
say that Obama is trying to install ÒEuropean style socialismÓ in the United
States, grossly simplifies European culture, as well as it dumbs down the
natural diversity of the American landscape as well as the true diversity of
the American people.
The same can be said of all
the other conservative and liberal descriptions. Furthermore while this current
meltdown began in the United States, it has become a pandemic much more severe
than the swine flu, because the infrastructure of all the world global
financial markets are infected. The global prosperity faux pas is based upon cheap
money and cheap credit, essentially borrowing from tomorrow to spend it today.
For some weeks I have been
going back to the 1970s to begin the discussion of where this all began to go
dreadfully wrong. The truth is however you can go back and start just about
anywhere from the founding of the American Republic, to even the Genesis Garden
in Eden.
What all these descriptions
do is focus on the macro, rather than the micro, the culture, rather than the
people. There was one book however, that is appropriate today as it was when it
was written after WWII. That book is ÒThe
Road to SerfdomÓ by F. A. Hayek, which describes really the rise of what we
would now spin as European style socialism.
If we have been on the road
for sixty years, perhaps we have now arrived. We are now serfs in a world in
which the common people donÕt really amount to much, as long as they pay their
rent and homage to the Lords, the system works fine, except that the people are
not really free. In other words
the present worldly system is not Òglobal free tradeÓ but rather global
feudalism.
Let us look at the
dictionary definition of feudalism:
The dominant social
system in medieval Europe, in which the nobility held lands from the Crown in
exchange for military service, and vassals were in turn tenants of the nobles,
while the peasants (villeins or serfs) were obliged to live on their lordÕs land
and give him homage, labor, and a share of the produce, notionally in exchange
for military protection.
For a more and comprehensive
descriptive discussion see Feudalism.
So if you bothered to work
through some of the examples and the history of feudalism in the link, you will
see that it really is an evolving term, pretty much in the broad context as
applicable today as it was in the ninth through the fourteenth centuries. Are
you looked at as a serf or a consumer unit? Is there really any difference?
Let us put feudalism in a
little more historic context. Following in succession from the fourteenth
– sixteenth centuries you have the Renaissance, which coincided with the
Reformation that took up much of the sixteenth. Following in the seventeenth
and eighteenth began the Enlightenment. The Industrial age began in earnest in
the nineteenth and carried us through the twentieth.
Those who do not learn from
history are bound to repeat it.
So in a simplistic rendition
in western culture over about the last thousand years we see the following. In
the beginning individual people had little or no value. They were taken care of
by an elite, which controlled all the natural wealth and the means by which it
was maintained.
The Renaissance began slowly
as people discovered that people really had a brain that worked quite well when
challenged. Most of this related in some aspect due to the understanding that
there was a God and that he had a plan by which individual people could be set
free from individual bondage to a ruling elite. Whether that elite be kings, or
lords, or popes, really didnÕt matter. The Reformation and ensuing wars, both
natural and cultural, changed the face of Europe at that time and the effects
are still present today.
Once man was freed as an
individual and formal education became more widespread beyond the priesthood,
mankind came up with all kinds of innovative ideas, some of them were
intellectual, and again some were quite practical. Slowly this enlightenment
began to believe that man did not need God but was completely free to develop
in his own way. The founding of the United States rested upon that tension
between man and God. The United States Constitution basically codified human
freedom to develop everything as long as we realized that there were absolute
values that kept common moral values.
In the Industrial age began
an increasing reliance on stuff to make life much more pleasant. As things got
easier, it was easier to think that we made this prosperity solely by our own
intellect. As we evolved we lost sight of the fact that civilization is
maintained by absolute values and more importantly unbridled or uncontrolled
freedom brings anarchy, chaos, and social disruption.
Now in the twenty-first
century for the first time in a thousand years we are experimenting on the
brink of a new medieval, dark ages, feudal culture. As long as the future is
spun in only human centered Òchange we can believe in,Ó the serfdom road is sure.
Along that road socialism, utopianism, Marxism, and fascism are only variations
on a theme. That theme is that people are no different than other animals; as
such they can be trained and bred just like any other animal. We know that is
true because evolution is true, and we have known that truth, not for a
thousand years but ÒscientificallyÓ for about a hundred and fifty years, and
culturally for about fifty. It
must then logically follow that material stuff and philosophical materialism
are truly civil unions, for after all marriage is really just an archaic
religious term.
Try to get your mind around
the fact that even though you may passively find the thought of being a serf
degrading, that is what the Lords, Vassals, and Knights of the elite classes of
enterprise and politics consider you to be. ÒTo be or not to be, that is the question?Ó This question of
course not only applies to citizens of the United States but to every other
country around the world.
ÒLife is a stage and each
must play their part.Ó Is that true to your own script, or the script to those
who tell you to pay (sic) your part, those who pay your salary, and at least
for the time being in the United States, your health care?
Bringing this back around to
the birth of the church at Pentecost. Those early Christians were dry bones,
brought back to life by the Spirit of God. Those living humans changed the
known Roman world in less than a century. That Spirit does two things of
importance for this article. First of all it divinely grants you infinite worth
as a human individual past, present, and future.
With that unique
understanding of your own worth, for the first time you can unselfishly see the
worth of others. That includes not just other Christians, but other others. But
the catch is, as goes the song, ÒThe only way to keep it is to give it
away.Ó
I suppose there are a lot of
people that find, or hope to find security at Destination Serfdom. However, I
would submit that you never really realized that you either are now a serf, or
are a Òserf in training.Ó For the most part that training is tied to
indoctrination of divinity of material stuff and philosophical materialism. Put
bluntly you must be a consumer of stuff, for life has no other purpose.
The turbulent times we are now
undergoing, will give you the perspective to analyze that process with a new,
somewhat absolute perspective, you probably did not know you possessed. The
Destination Serfdom can be demolished while it is still under construction.
Going back in history it is probably best described as a renaissance
reformation. You have a choice to play the role for which you were created, or
to continue to be a serf. It is pretty much that black and white, for that is
the unfolding times in which we live.
Make your choice and follow
and grasp that destiny or the lack of destiny that serfs must carry alone.
© 2009 under Creative
Commons License 3.0, see website for details.